Bruce Waller
  • Home
  • Vita
  • Free Will Without Moral Responsibility
  • Against Moral Responsibility
  • Textbooks One
  • Textbooks Two
  • Articles
  • The Moral Responsibility System
  • An Alternative to the Moral Responsibility System
  • Ethics
  • Critical Thinking
  • Vita
  • The Desire to Be a God

Against Moral Responsibility

Picture
 Against Moral Responsibility critiques the major contemporary arguments in support of moral responsibility, and argues that moral responsibility is implausible within a naturalistic world view. Belief in moral responsibility can be supported only by appeal to special miraculous self-making powers or by refusing to look deeper at the rich and detailed causes of human behavior. Careful scrutiny of contemporary research in psychology and biology and sociology leaves no room for plausible claims of moral responsibility. Advocates of moral responsibility claim that denial of moral responsibility would be disastrous; to the contrary, the moral responsibility system promotes harsh treatment, blocks understanding, and results in blaming the victim, while the rejection of moral responsibility opens the way to deeper and better understanding which leads to more humane policies and a more equitable social structure. Because of the powerful and pervasive moral responsibility system challenges to moral responsibility are difficult: challenges to such deep assumptions seem absurd, because they are examined from within the moral responsibility system.

Against Moral Responsibility was discussed by Daniel Dennett, Thomas Clark, and Bruce Waller on Clark's excellent site, Naturalism.org. That discussion can be accessed here.

Daniel Dennett's Naturalism.org review of Against Moral Responsibility can be found here.

William A. Rottschaefer's detailed review (in Behavior and Philosophy) is here; Bruce Waller's reply is here.
The MIT Press web page for Against Moral Responsibility is here.

The Amazon web page for Against Moral Responsibility is here.

Paul Russell discusses Against Moral Responsibility as one of "the Best Books on Free Will and Moral Responsibility," here.
Reviews of Against Moral Responsibility
Saul Smilansky, in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews: here
Michael J. Zimmerman, in Mind: here
Charles Hinkley, in The American Journal of Bioethics: here
Robert Maciel, in The European Legacy: here
Robert Hauptman, in Journal of Information Ethics, Volume 26, Number 2, Fall 2017
John Bolender, in Metapsychology Online Reviews: here
James McBain, in Essays in Philosophy: here
Neil Levy, Philosophy in Review: here

  • Home
  • Vita
  • Free Will Without Moral Responsibility
  • Against Moral Responsibility
  • Textbooks One
  • Textbooks Two
  • Articles
  • The Moral Responsibility System
  • An Alternative to the Moral Responsibility System
  • Ethics
  • Critical Thinking
  • Vita
  • The Desire to Be a God